1950 Austin A135 vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A135 weights approximately 840 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1950 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A135 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1950 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2630 mm |