1950 Austin A135 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Austin A135 (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1992 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Austin A135 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Ranger.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A135 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A135 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
