1950 Austin A135 vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Austin A135 (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Austin A135 should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A135 weights approximately 1564 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Austin A135 (288 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (180 Nm). This means 1950 Austin A135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Extreme.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A135 | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
| Make | Austin | Lotus |
| Model | A135 | Extreme |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 700 cc |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 288 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 456 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2420 mm |
