1950 Austin A135 vs. 2001 Nissan Chappo
To start off, 2001 Nissan Chappo is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan Chappo (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A135 weights approximately 735 kg more than 2001 Nissan Chappo.
Because 1950 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan Chappo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Nissan Chappo (359 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A135. (288 Nm). This means 2001 Nissan Chappo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A135.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 2001 Nissan Chappo | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A135 | Chappo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2953 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 288 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |