1950 Austin A135 vs. 2003 Chevrolet SS
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet SS (430 HP) has 306 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet SS should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A135 weights approximately 360 kg more than 2003 Chevrolet SS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chevrolet SS (583 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A135. (288 Nm). This means 2003 Chevrolet SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A135.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 2003 Chevrolet SS | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A135 | SS |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 430 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 583 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 64 L |