1950 Austin A135 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 5,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 254 kg more than 1950 Austin A135. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A135. (288 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A135.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A135 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A135 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 5555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 288 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 98 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 106 L |
