1950 Austin A135 vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Austin A135 weights approximately 100 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Austin A135. (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Austin A135.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Austin | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | A135 | CLS |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.4 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |