1950 Austin A135 vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 385 kg more than 1950 Austin A135.
Because 1950 Austin A135 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Austin A135. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Austin A135 (288 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1950 Austin A135 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Austin A135 | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A135 | Livina |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 288 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2020 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 52 L |