1950 Austin A135 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Austin A135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Austin A135 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Austin A135 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1950 Austin A135. (124 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1950 Austin A135.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Austin A135. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 288 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Austin A135 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A135 | Captiva |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 124 HP | 253 HP |
| Torque | 288 Nm | 288 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4673 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1756 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2707 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 65 L |
