1950 BMW 340 vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1950 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 BMW 340 | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 340 | 240 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2660 mm |
