1950 BMW 340 vs. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 5,001 cc (8 cylinders), 1991 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro (210 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 240 kg more than 1950 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 BMW 340 | 1991 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 340 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5001 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |
