1950 BMW 340 vs. 1991 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1991 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 BMW 340 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 BMW 340 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1991 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1950 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 BMW 340 | 1991 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 340 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1950 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2440 mm |