1950 BMW 340 vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 BMW 340 weights approximately 572 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 BMW 340 | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | BMW | Lotus |
| Model | 340 | Emme |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 260 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2770 mm |
