1950 BMW 340 vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 35 kg more than 1950 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1950 BMW 340 | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | 340 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2540 mm |