1950 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 447 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1024 kg more than 1950 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 BMW 340 | 2003 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | 340 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 8277 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 500 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3030 mm |
