1950 BMW 340 vs. 2003 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XF is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XF weights approximately 100 kg more than 1950 BMW 340.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 BMW 340 | 2003 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 340 | XF |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1240 mm |
