1950 BMW 340 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 561 kg more than 1950 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 BMW 340 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 340 | Equinox |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1811 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2857 mm |