1950 BMW 340 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 BMW 340 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (414 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 1950 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 395 kg more than 1950 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 BMW 340 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 340 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1645 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1412 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2720 mm |