1950 Bristol 401 vs. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 8,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado (198 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1950 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 401 | 1974 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 401 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 8191 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2275 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3220 mm |
