1950 Bristol 401 vs. 1988 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Bristol 401 weights approximately 75 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1950 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 401 | 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 401 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1950 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2842 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |