1950 Bristol 401 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 73 kg more than 1950 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (447 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Bristol 401. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Bristol 401.

Compare all specifications: