1950 Bristol 401 vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2003 Renault Kangoo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 401 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 401 (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 401 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1950 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Kangoo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Bristol 401 (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1950 Bristol 401 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 401 | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Bristol | Renault |
Model | 401 | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2630 mm |