1950 Bristol 401 vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 401 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 401. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 401.
Because 1950 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 401 | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 401 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |