1950 Bristol 401 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 401.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Bristol 401. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Bristol 401.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 401 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Bristol | Nissan |
| Model | 401 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 137 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2640 mm |
