1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1962 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1962 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1962 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1962 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1962 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 450 | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2060 mm |