1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1965 Simca 1000
To start off, 1965 Simca 1000 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1965 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1965 Simca 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1965 Simca 1000 | |
Make | Bristol | Simca |
Model | 450 | 1000 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 944 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 65 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 36 L |