1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1986 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 420 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1986 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 450 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1950 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2580 mm |