1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1990 Renault Alpine
To start off, 1990 Renault Alpine is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,458 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Renault Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Alpine (182 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Alpine should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Renault Alpine weights approximately 480 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1990 Renault Alpine | |
Make | Bristol | Renault |
Model | 450 | Alpine |
Year Released | 1950 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 63 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |