1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1995 Rover 214
To start off, 1995 Rover 214 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1995 Rover 214. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 214. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 214 weights approximately 302 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 214, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1995 Rover 214 | |
Make | Bristol | Rover |
Model | 450 | 214 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |