1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,973 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (343 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 946 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | Bristol | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 450 | E |
Year Released | 1950 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 343 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1676 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |