1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,963 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (185 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 918 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 450 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1950 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 185 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 98.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 87 L |