1950 Bristol 450 vs. 1999 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1999 Mercury Sable is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 153 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mercury Sable weights approximately 780 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 1999 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Bristol | Mercury |
Model | 450 | Sable |
Year Released | 1950 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 85 L |