1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,819 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1530 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 450 | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Bristol | GMC |
| Model | 450 | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4819 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2950 mm |
