1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,990 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (229 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 450 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
| Make | Bristol | BMW |
| Model | 450 | Z3 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 89.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1405 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 51 L |
