1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2003 Chevrolet Cheyenne | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 450 | Cheyenne |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1950 mm |