1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru R2 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Bristol | Subaru |
Model | 450 | R2 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 66.8 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 30 L |