1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2003 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2003 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 990 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 450 | 2003 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 450 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3270 mm |
