1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 957 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Bristol | Lincoln |
Model | 450 | LS |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 229 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |