1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford F-250 weights approximately 2126 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 103 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 144 L |