1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 520 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Bristol | Mitsubishi |
Model | 450 | Colt |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2834 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 95 L |