1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Rustler weights approximately 220 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 450 | Rustler |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |