1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. (95 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 340 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.

Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Bristol 450 2008 Mitsubishi Colt
Make Bristol Mitsubishi
Model 450 Colt
Year Released 1950 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 1493 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 95 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 66 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 92 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 730 kg 1070 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 47 L