1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2008 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Toyota Tundra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 602 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2008 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Bristol | Toyota |
Model | 450 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 100 L |