1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2009 Cadillac SRX is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1221 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Bristol 450 | 2009 Cadillac SRX | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 450 | SRX |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1951 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 76 L |
