1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2009 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2009 Ford Maverick is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,987 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Bristol 450 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2009 Ford Maverick. (122 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Bristol 450 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Maverick weights approximately 785 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450.
Because 2009 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2009 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 450 | Maverick |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 62 L |