1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Impala

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 883 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Bristol 450 2010 Chevrolet Impala
Make Bristol Chevrolet
Model 450 Impala
Year Released 1950 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 153 HP 211 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 730 kg 1613 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 5090 mm
Vehicle Width 1660 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1491 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2807 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 64 L