1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Silverado (302 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 1588 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2010 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
Model | 450 | Silverado |
Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 2318 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1875 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 98 L |