1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Bristol 450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Juke weights approximately 604 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Bristol | Nissan |
Model | 450 | Juke |
Year Released | 1950 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1334 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |