1950 Bristol 450 vs. 2012 Acura RL
To start off, 2012 Acura RL is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1950 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1950 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura RL weights approximately 1122 kg more than 1950 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Acura RL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Bristol 450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Bristol 450 | 2012 Acura RL | |
Make | Bristol | Acura |
Model | 450 | RL |
Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4971 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2799 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 73 L |