1950 Buick 40 vs. 1964 Holden EJ
To start off, 1964 Holden EJ is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1964 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1964 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 1964 Holden EJ | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | EJ |
Year Released | 1950 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2680 mm |